|
Sunday June 6/Morning
HISTONE MODIFICATIONS
Khalid Siddiqui
The session on histone modifications covered recent advances in
understanding how these epigenetic programs regulate gene expression.
Chromatin biology has come a long way since the naïve models depicting
simple transcriptional networks and several genome sequences later,
permits a global analysis on how such modifications affect gene
expression patterns.
Michael Grunstein (UCLA School of Medicine) suggested that the
covalent attachment of different functional groups on histone residues
generates diverse binding surfaces for different proteins. This implies
that several different combinations of histone modifications are
possible of which there must be a finite number of physiologically
relevant combinations correlated with activating or repressing
proteins/complexes. The presence or absence of acetylation marks have
been shown by several groups to have opposing effects on the expression
of genes in vivo. To study the role of histone acetylation in greater
detail, Grunstein’s group has raised and characterized antibodies
against 11 known acetyl-histone peptides from histones H2A. H2B, H3 and
H4. These antibodies were then used in large scale chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to isolate the DNA fragments
associated with such acetylated histones and these were screened on
microarrays representing the promoter regions and open reading frames of
about 6000 genes. Their analysis reveals that there are indeed patterns
of acetylations that can be grouped into clusters. These clusters
represent groups of genes that are similarly regulated and are in
related biological pathways. Not surprisingly, it was observed that
genes within a given cluster have binding sites for common transcription
factors and the efficient binding of these may be correlated with the
associated patterns of modifications. This was examined in some detail
for the association of the Hos2 histone deacetylase and the Bdf1
transcription factor that were shown to associate with promoters of
active genes. Mutational analysis revealed that Bdf1 association was
dependent on an acetylation pattern that was generated by the action of
Hos2 on specific lysine residues thus corroborating the ChIP data.
On a repressing note, Thomas Jenuwein (IMP, Vienna) described work
being done in his lab on histone methylation patterns. Jenuwein’s group
has also raised antibodies against modified histones, although these are
against mono-, di- and tri-methylated histone residues - either histone
H3K9, H3K27 or H4K20. An immunofluorescence analysis in mouse embryonic
fibroblasts revealed specific staining patterns for these modifications
with a strong association found in the pericentric heterochromatin.
Surprisingly, in cells deficient for Suv3-9h1 activity (which is the
specific H3K9 methyltransferase), not only are the staining patterns for
H3K9 altered as expected, but so are those of trimethylated H4K20. This
simple observation led to the identification of two novel histone
methyltransferases, Suv4-20h1 and Suv4-20h2. In vitro analysis shows
that these novel enzymes have different substrate specificities from the
Suv3-9h1 and use octamers and nucleosomes more efficiently as substrates
than free histones. Analysis of the fly homolog of these genes shows
that Suv4-20 acts as a PEV modifier thus establishing its role as a key
epigenetic player in this pathway. This modification was also examined
in fission yeast extracts by immunoblotting and was strongly represented
implying a global and ancient role for this modification in regulating
gene expression. Analysis of the H4K20-trimethyl epitope in mammalian
cells reveals its enrichment at repeat elements in the genome and this
may very well turn out to have an important function in maintaining
genomic integrity. Based on these data, a model was proposed whereby the
Suv4-20 enzymes function downstream of Suv3-9, using trimethylated H3K9
histones as substrates to trimethylate H4K20, perhaps in an HP1
dependent manner, to repress these genomic loci.
Moving on from trimethylated H3K9 to trimethylated H3K27, there were
three talks that elaborated on recent studies on gene regulation by
polycomb complexes. The first was a biochemical analysis presented by
Danny Reinberg (UNDMJ, New Jersey) whose group purified tagged PRC
complexes using an overexpression system from cultured human cells. In
vitro methylation assays revealed that activity of this complex is
uniquely modulated by linker H1 histone. Moreover, it was revealed that
overexpression of Ezh2 caused changes in endogenous levels of the Eed
isoforms implying that polycomb complexes were regulating the expression
of their own subunits. In other experiments examining the PRC4 complex,
it was demonstrated that the Sirt1 deacetylase was intimately and
specifically associated with this complex and this was recapitulated in
vitro. Interestingly, this association was dependent on the deacetylase
activity of the Sirt1, which modifies the same lysine residue targeted
by PRC4 for methylation. Immunoblotting analysis of different cells
showed a massive upregulation of PRC subunits in cancerous cells and
presently, work is being done to examine the role of PRC using a mouse
model of prostate cancer.
Yi Zhang (UNCH) described a series of experiments investigating the
regulation of Hox gene expression and argued that aberrant histone
methylation by hDot1L resulted in leukemogenesis and discussed
experiments done to identify various small molecule inhibitors of this
activity. Zhang’s group has also purified tagged human PRC complexes
from human cells and reconstituted it in vitro using baculovirus
expression vectors. He demonstrated how knockdown of the PRC subunits
correlated with a loss of H3K27 methylation with an upregulation of Hox
gene expression and it was suggested that this was reminiscent of normal
MLL/hDot1L mediated leukemogenesis. To complete the story, he described
the identification of hRing2 as the ubiquitin ligase for histone
H2B-K119 and presented data that loss of Ring2 function in different
species also resulted in upregulation of the Hox gene clusters. A model
was presented in which PRC activity co-operated with histone
ubiquitination to upregulate Hox gene expression and result in
leukemogenesis.
The third talk on this issue was presented by Vincenzo Pirrotta
(Univ. of Geneva) whose group is investigating the regulation of Ubx
gene expression in flies by the polycomb complex. His results indicate
that PcG mediates repression by preventing the initiation of
transcription. In addition, data from ChIP experiments revealed that PcG
repression occurs in cis via spreading of silencing marks across the
entire locus, probably by sequential methylation of nucleosomes. He
finally described a novel gene called Esc-like which was probably
responsible for maintaining these methylation marks in later development
when the normal Esc gene is inactive.
Differential gene expression can be effected not only by histone
modifications but also by histone variants and Srinivas Chakravarthy
from Karolin Luger’s lab (Colorado State University) presented a
crystallographic view of epigenetics with the elucidation of high
resolution structures of domains from the macro-H2A histone. This
variant is normally found enriched at the inactive X chromosome in
female mammals. The analysis reveals that differences in residues
constituting the L1-loop in histone H2A confers differential flexibility
to these histones, which share otherwise superimposable structures, and
this difference may be responsible for protein-protein interactions that
determine the fate of gene expression. Domain swapping experiments
demonstrated that these residues were sufficient to alter the
localization of the major H2A to the inactive X, yet insufficient to
disrupt the localization of macro-H2A. suggesting that the unique C
terminus of the variant has other localization signals or interaction
domains that recruit it to these loci. Further work will elucidate the
interacting partners of the L1 loop and the non-histone region.
During this session, Thomas Jenuwein announced the formation of “The
Epigenome” initiative to promote Epigenetics research in Europe with
funding opportunities for young scientists interested in pursuing
research in this field. He also promised an interactive and collegial
atmosphere for researchers to exchange ideas and information as well as
a website that would be updated with the most recent information in the
fields covered in this Symposium.
Other
Dispatches
Symposium
69 Live
Symposia
Past (a bit of history and photographs from previous Symposia)
Online
Symposium Volumes (searchable database of past Symposia volumes and
currently received manuscripts) |

Khalid Siddiqui
(Stillman lab)
2
0
0
4 |